Exhibit A: https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkgbwm/chinese-woman-fake-ru...
Exhibit A: https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkgbwm/chinese-woman-fake-ru...
It was a long con, they created a fake band, added references to various obscure pages, etc. ultimately a page was created with the photo posted that followed every Wikipedia policy except for being false.
I’m sure people are doing that professionally. The problem with Wikipedia is that it’s awesome except for when it isn’t.
The weakness of the system is that it depends on arbitrary standards of notability and online reference. Not novel problems but you need to have a different kind of critical eye than other platforms.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dgpnq/wikipedia-and-google-...
Foolish as it may seem, people use Wikipedia to vet stuff and make decisions.
Eventually they were discovered and their edits reverted. The misinformation was on the site for years.
This is like Donald Trump now (finally) admitting he lost the 2020 election fair and square and that Biden is the legitimate president of the United States and then using that as an example of what an honest and upstanding democracy-loving bloke he is. Ehh ... no.