Hacker News Reader

> there has never been AI art before now.

This is a bold claim. I disagree with it.

Here is a book from 2006 that already touches on genetic AI creatures evolving and similar topics as art.

No, it wasn't the topic for the parent comment which tilts the definition in this direction: >they have no idea as to "what" they are painting.

You just shifted to "you can't distinguish" - a common tactic for wanna-be AI hypists.

Also, there has never been AI art before now.

There has however been machine generated art since at least the 50s. How is this not just the natural evolution of that?

I’m the GP, this wasn’t the topic of my comment above.