You are going into meta-metaphysics. The analogue of paranoia in philosophy. You gain zero knowledge by exploring a problem that way.

"Table" exists, universally, within the agent's conception of a table symbol. A particular table exists within the agent's reflexive awareness of a table-like symbol. And a singular, physical table, exists while the agent's sensorial perception of the physical object is recursivelly reiterating its existence through the agent's own accusative judgment of the experience as being sourced, mediated, or targeted as a table-like event.

Now. With this baloney out of the way. What is your point?