Its very interesting to see the change of quality of technical writing over the last two decades. There's a definite, observable increase in click-bait style writing.
Its very interesting to see the change of quality of technical writing over the last two decades. There's a definite, observable increase in click-bait style writing.
If I read something, and it holds my interest for 2 minutes or so, I print the article to PDF for archival purposes. I've done this now for 20+ years and have a huge history of things that have interested me over the years.
Its extraordinary to see the change in the web, even in just the last 5 years, in terms of click-bait techniques and content.
So I was thinking aloud/asking if preserving this type of content is a) worthwhile, b) straightforward
Downside of this is that I'm probably at around 30% rate of what I can treat this way (the highlighting / clipping is a bit more time intensive than I'd like and needs to be done at a PC, while for reading I prefer a Kobo e-reader).
Upside is that in Joplin I can keep track of no matter what text, including the discussions on HN / elsewhere.
I've got over 70,000+ .pdf files in that archive now. Its very easy to query for data in this archive - ls is a surprisingly useful search tool when combined with a few |'s and grep's... and pdf2text is highly useful as well!
One of these days I'll get around to making some word cloud tools or so, maybe scanning the archive to find my favourite 3rd party sites, etc.