A Second Constitutional Convention? Some Republicans Want to Force One
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Of course the media tells us most Republicans are racist misogynists slavering for a new empire led by an anointed God King. They seem to have a distorted view, in other words; so its hardly surprising that they're inaccurate here, either.
And Republicans chose Donald Trump as their leader in order to disprove this perception?
Republicans are split on Trump:
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/08/09/2-traits-of-...
My guess is that if Trump runs for president in 2024 he will split the Republican vote and will not win.
Trump's role in the January 6th insurrection, Trump's claims that the election was stolen, and his pressure on voting officials to "find the votes"[1] have caused about half of Republicans to turn against him and other Republicans that support him.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump/in-rec...
Edit: Republican support for Trump in 2020 was stronger than I remembered:
"Ideological divisions within the parties were also apparent in the vote, with both Trump and Biden doing better among the ideological core of their parties. Trump received the votes of 97% of conservative Republicans and leaners but a smaller majority (79%) of Republicans who describe themselves as moderate or liberal. Biden took 98% of the vote among liberal Democrats and leaners and 91% among those who are moderate or conservative."
Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/30/behind-biden...
So that's where some of the view of Republicans comes from.
That is the revolutionary spirit that animates many Trump supporters who are disgusted with Trump, which is so dangerous that it must be suppressed with extralegal means. A "big tent" philosophy.
He and I tend to be on opposite sides of the political spectrum, though I'd say we're both fairly centrist. I'm trying to assess whether he's been caught up in an alarmist bubble, or if there is reason for real concern.
This article makes me think I've been burying my head in the sand.
If you have expatriated from the US, where'd you end up, and how do you feel about that decision in retrospect?
https://reason.com/volokh/2022/09/05/my-skepticism-about-fea...
Whatever is passed in such a convention must be ratified by legislatures (or state conventions) in 3/4 of all states (38 states). It is very unlikely that particularly conservative or liberal proposals could meet that bar.
I might take this seriously if federal-level Republicans ever made a principled stand for fiscal restraint. Instead, they wholeheartedly endorse the Keynesian low interest rate treadmill and gluttonous corporate welfare, while making a show of opposing any spending that would compensate for the havoc it then wreaks on the middle class. Kicking off the downfall, the gold standard was ended under Nixon, a Republican. And in the present day, our economy is currently being ravaged by the $6B Trumpflation, that Republicans are desperately trying to pin on the current administration who merely showed up after the fuse was lit.
Modern Monetary Theory and the Austrian School are the two ends of the spectrum of honest approaches. The Republican money-printing corporate-giveaway "trickle-down" hypocrisy has destroyed the decentralized economy, and pinned our younger generations under a crushing asset bubble that leaves them little route to starting families of their own. Politically, the lack of a coherent fiscally restrained political option is exactly what is causing younger people to abandon belief in "late stage capitalism" all together, and embrace even more centralized approaches. The first step to creating a workable political alternative is to call out Republican fiscal hypocrisy for what it is.
(Just to be clear here - I have little love for the Democratic Party or the deep state. But I'd rather have the wheels stay on the cart than have it be overrun by misled nutjobs)