Then why not keep the plant online until solar is running. Increasing energy costs will affect the poorest and most vulnerable. There’s no pressing need to shut down the plant sooner than its replacement is ready.
Then why not keep the plant online until solar is running. Increasing energy costs will affect the poorest and most vulnerable. There’s no pressing need to shut down the plant sooner than its replacement is ready.
Energy transitions aren’t easy. There will be missteps.
(I would agree the local and or state government should provide support for low income electric users impacted by this until rates come back down from more renewables online pushing out oil generation; cut the utility a check and define the means testing)
> Average electric bill will go up $15/month
What does bad policy look like in your opinion, if not this? It’s an avoidable fuck-up.
https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/coal-price
https://www.wvpublic.org/energy-environment/2022-07-12/coal-...
If my city increased by utility price by 4% because they messed up the sequencing on a contract it would be a sign of poor planning.
How much more are you really willing to pay for completely flawless sequencing?