Judge declines to overturn Elizabeth Holmes guilty verdict

They (e.g. George Shlutz, Henry Kissinger, etc.) primarily invested because they knew her father and it was a done deal due to their old-boy network. They got what they deserved when they failed to perform even minimal due diligence.

She absolutely took advantage of their blind faith in their social network and was pushing obviously fraudulent technology. But the investors were all idiots also. Both should be jailed!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10366623/Meet-Thera...

From the article "...lying to investors about a Theranos technology she hailed as a revolution in healthcare but which in practice produced dangerously inaccurate results."

Duping investors clearly isn't the worst crime committed here. The true crime is puting sick people at even more health risk simply because she wanted to be a billionaire. I could care less about losing money, just like I don't cry when a stock or property I own plummets in value - there is risk (gamble), and I accept it when it doesn't work out in my favor unless someone is literally stealing from me intentionally and even then I admit partial negligence as I should have done more due dillegence to prevent being dupped. However, when my family consults a healthcare provider, I trust them to not intentionally harm us.

So, yes, I join the chorus and say good riddence Elizabeth and we'll done law enforcement.