Fylm: AI-powered web colour corrector

you're clearly not the target audience, but I feel exactly the same way. but, i'm old skool. if you're the type to have a bunch of highly compressed MP4 files as source recorded with a profile that allows for post color correction, I could see where storing these small footprint filesizes live in a shared/common bucket. Maybe content creators shooting on their mobile devices would be a target who are already using a cloud provider to store the content.

i just hate acquiring footage in any format that would be accepted in an MP4, so this would never appeal to me.

Maybe the idea is you can upload one or two example shots to develop a look for use in another tool (via an exported LUT)? It’s hard to imagine uploading enough raw footage to grade anything longer than a commercial…

I developed a WebGL powered CC tool which centered around LUTs about 5 years ago, and this is the reason I abandoned it. No one is asking for this workflow.

I find myself needing to do some video editing maybe ten times a year - mostly for using videos as textures in 3d graphics but also small marketing clips. Usually just trimming, resizing, or clipping so I use ffmpeg. But anytime I need to do more I find myself searching for easy to learn, easily accessible video editing apps and I'm always disappointed. One thing I do sometimes need to do is switch color spaces or do other color correction on a clip.

So it sounds like this is perfect for me. It's not for video editing professionals. It's for the much larger community of people who need to do occasional video editing. If it's on the web that's a bonus actually because I don't have to worry about installing or what platform I'm using it on.

Obviously the tradeoff is you're gonna have trouble with multi-gigabyte raw footage. But that's a perfectly acceptable tradeoff.

They probably have a way to deploy it to you locally if you have 400GB blobs and money.

I don’t agree with your criticism.

On my iPhone indoors I could clearly see both the “workflow animation” and color variations in the examples further down.

Looks like a cool application.

I'm not really sure I get the comparison bar charts down below - it shows fylm.ai all the way to the right and the other ones... not, but it's not clear what it's showing and I thought smaller bar charts would be better if measuring speed / performance?

Also, why is there no information about the management team on the site? I've noticed that a lot more recently that companies are reluctant to post any information about the team. Is there a reason for that?