Hacker News Reader

The "radiology stuff" is not happening. Data from BLS (https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm)

Employed Radiologic Technologists in the US:

2014 - 193,400

2021 - 216,380

The growth is larger than the overall population growth in the same period. And that is in a very outsourceable occupation.

View on HN

To be fair, Radiologic Technologists are different than a Radiologist. The former is a certification requiring a 2 year degree, the latter requires a Doctorate of Medicine which takes an additional 4 years at least on top of 4 years of undergrad. Then you need 4 years of residency and an additional sub-speciality year on top of that to be a Radiologist.

So, very different.

Yes. Techs and doctors are different!

The latter is a subset of the former in BLS statistics and I am using the larger category only because BLS apparently only started counting Radiologists as a separate subcategory in 2019.

Two points (your conclusion that AI hasn't had much effect yet may still be right):

Population growth isn't everything. The uninsured rate dropped from 12% to around 8% in that time period. Not many uninsured people get radiologist services unless it is an emergency.

And cheaper AI-assisted Radiologists could increase the overall employment of Radiologic Technologists.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com