I've been singlegänging around too long to let some upstart take the chalice. There can be only one.
I've been singlegänging around too long to let some upstart take the chalice. There can be only one.
It was delightfully funny when a Google interviewer called me for a phone screen one random morning, and was quite annoyed I had no idea what they were talking about. Then I realized what happened.
“Do you think I’m an Android engineer from Yahoo?” “Uh… yes?” “Yeah, that’s not me.”
I later looked him up on LinkedIn. Turns out, he got the job.
There's a lot of people with my name though... including a well-known author. I was really freaked out when I was taking a lunch break and the NPR announcer said I was to be interviewed on Fresh Air later in the day. I was woefully unprepared for such an interview; thankfully, it wasn't really me.
I remember thinking it was kind of weird and cool
I’m not familiar with the lore enough.
What is the significance of there being a/the buddha existing?
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2019/07/13/armstron...
It's still possible to look at a Chinese text and determine accurately whether an English translation should mark definiteness or indefiniteness on particular nouns. That wouldn't be possible if the distinction didn't make sense.
The Buddha is Buddha the guy.
An enlightened person is called an Arahat (Arahant). They are not Buddhas. The Buddha is one person in one world-system who rediscovers the Dhamma (Dharma) after it has been lost. Often a Buddha goes on to teach that Dhamma, but there are certain Buddhas who arise who never teach. These are called Paccekka Buddhas.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tara_(Buddhism)