O&O App Buster removes Windows Apps you don’t want
oo-software.com
oo-software.com
I did notice that certain apps couldn't be removed due to being in use. I rebooted and was able to remove those apps. Also, AppBuster doesn't seem to run in Safe Mode as it hung while scanning for apps.
Then in notifications there's more crap like news, sports, stocks I have zero interest in as have to uninstall.
Then it nags me about Apple TV (the subscription service) as well as Game Center.
I use my Mac 10x more than my PC but it's very similar in how much stuff I have to remove.
Just in the last 2 weeks I set up a new M1 Mac and upgraded to Windows 11 on my gamer PC. Sure Windows is worse but both are full of bloat.
I say most because I'm not 100% sure I managed to remove 100% of them, but my start menu is now clean.
Fun fact: "Zune" was never scrubbed from some of the names of these apps, the Films & TV crapware was (is?) still called "zunemusic" when you removed it with Powershell.
Though to be fair, we've all seen that kind of thing in the code and just left it well alone rather than pull on thr string and own the broken pieces you'll be handed for you trouble.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-movva-msn-messen...
On Win11, you can remove Windows Feedback with a right click -> uninstall.
There's no "contact support", but a "get help" which can't be removed the same way, but can be through the winget command.
However, I don't get the hate on Windows 11. It has all the same annoyances Windows 10 did (random apps installed, random CPU spikes for no reason, etc). Yet I find it works much better. It feels much snappier and boots much quicker, even though the PC I usually use it on isn't supposed to be supported (old ivy bridge CPU, no TPM). And no, it's not because it's a fresh install. It actually is an upgrade from the previous Win 10 install.
That said, I don't get the hate on Windows. In my case, I have used many variants of Linux: Debian, Mandrake, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Mint, LFS, Suse, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, and I currently have the latest Redhat on my ThinkPad T460s. And while incredibly what the community has done, in the end I always felt that either I was missing something (Adobe, Autocad, WinRAR, hibernate, etc), or that everything was more complicated than using Windows which just works on all on my machines.
Again, I can use Linux if needed, and I am not afraid of other OSes (used DOS, BSD, OS/2, AIX, BeOS), but for my use case, Windows is much more stable, has the apps I need to use, and just works out of the box.
Maybe one day I will migrate to Linux if Microsoft continues f*cking up with it.
Since my earlier days of using Windows, I have a strong impression that OS-tweaking tools are very much a double-edged sword. The advertised functions always look attractive, but maintaining a system with such tools has always been not as trivial as the authors were depicting it to be. Sometimes to the point that something would break immediately after tweaking a setting or using some sort of system 'cleaning' slash registry 'optimisation'. In my experience, the latter had always been breaking something. And the former wasn't ever a permanent solution. In other words, given the possible complications and maintenance implications, these tools felt borderline malicious.
But it's been years if not a decade since I last used something like that. How are the things with tools like the ones O&O offer these days? My impression is, 'Shutup' seems like it could very well break a thing or two. And that Buster thing seems... superfluous? I'd rather remove unwanted apps with tools at hand. And if that would involve some black magic, then maybe they shouldn't be removed at all? What's the use in fighting windmills just to remove some default media player?
Anyway, not looking to bash on the O&O software, but merely curious what experience people have with 'tweakers' these days.
PS: I was quite surprized to see a freaking CC-cleaner installed on some modern systems. What's up with that, too?
That said, Windows 11 has turned much attention to these tools due to all of the useless crap they're including on default installs. And by useless, I specifically mean the litany of "pre-installed" app shortcuts.
You can't feel too much of the bloat anymore in a clean MS windows install and i never use the modern apps anyways (though a lot of drivers are starting to convert to that system) so uninstalling them all should not really be an issue. I've also been using StopUpdates10 to control my updates for the last few years.
Didn't break anything but the first thing I noticed is that Edge had no browser history, which of course you can turn back on but it was a somewhat hard to find option, and I wouldn't consider that a 'default tweak' necessarily.
at least I don't think it broke anything, but I think many people will still run into things that suddenly don't work with these tools.
These days I leave programs like OneDrive, app store, edge, the xbox ones unless it's like a VM.
My computer runs how I want it to.
Some specialized cases require office, but for the typical document or spreadsheet it’s very easy to avoid it.
lol, no it doesn't.
LinuxFan:
What Debian?? Sooo stupid...X is much better.
WindowUser:
No cant use Linux because X, and please stop telling me that.
OpenBSD Fan:
Grrmll Grrmmll pfff Linux.
Plan9:
I hate that dirty bloated unix stuff!
OpenVMS:
Sorry my uptime is 20 years cant reboot and install an OS.
It just reminds me of that Stallmann-urge to tell everyone what "real" freedom is (his meaning of freedom only (good)freedom)