You think trans activism is equivalent to shooting someone?
I mean, i think most people are going to dismiss you as crazy if you think words and ideas of any form are equivalently violent to shooting someone in the head. At the very least you would need to back up such a radical proposition with some very compelling arguments.
Person was responding to a comment that mentioned shooting, and proposing an alternate situation. One presumes they are claiming the alternate situation is equivalent or their comment makes no sense as a response to the previous comment they were replying to.
>You think trans activism is equivalent to shooting someone?
You missed a pretty important word there.
And ideologies caused more damages and deaths in history than any conventional "war".
... or maybe there is no ideology, but just people claiming some basic rights?
Its sort of like if you said, beans are just as bad as being shot, then later clarified that you are talking about fatal food poisioning from bad beans. I mean, i guess technically fatal food poisioning is about as bad as being shot, but if you just say "beans are like being shot" without qualification, people are going to think that's a crazy statement, because it is.
* to be clear im talking hypothetically. I don't agree that "trans-activism" (whatever the fuck that means) is violence in any way shape or form.
The Conservative push to make trans people the new Boogeyman is absolutely wretched.