To clarify this isn't an affidavit, I just meant that there is clearly a stylistic choice here to have a certain form. Here's an arbitrary example of a criminal complaint (just because it was the first court document I found):

https://www.gwern.net/docs/darknet-markets/2013-ulbricht-com...

The way things are presented in sections with numbered subsections, the way some things in the beginning appear to be redacted, are clearly meant to convey the authority of an official document submitted to a legal body.

I'm sure this doesn't violate any sort of law and that you are permitted to write a letter like this and submit it to regulators. What I'm suggesting is that the stylistic choices they make are indicative of the audience they are writing for, and that it is different from their stated intentions. And that suggests to me that this document has an agenda and is willing to accomplish it through deceptive means (those being, lying about the purpose and audience of the document to enhance it's perceived authority by giving the general public the impression they are the fly on the wall of an official proceeding rather than reading a document for their own consumption that may have no bearing on the outcome of this dispute), which is my personal standard for calling something propaganda.