A New Test for an Old Theory About Dreams
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
It was this
https://www.pexels.com/photo/drone-shot-of-fort-alexander-89...
https://www.pexels.com/photo/the-fort-alexander-on-an-artifi...
After rem sleep the symbols that did not get integrated into a series get trashed. The memory behind the symbol is still there but the symbol reference is removed to free up the mind. This is where the feeling of mental rest comes from. Finally the actionable symbols are muted. Waking up feeling like you just got out of a fight of some kind is definitely a heedable warning.
For that there is prayer.
In case of a DV, one explanation (the one I’ll be sticking to here) is that a brief lag[0] in the perception of the current moment by a part of your mind results in a feeling that this moment had been perceived before.
I believe that to self-repair, so to speak, your mind would scramble to look up a matching past experience. However, the lag takes place at a pretty low level, and what your mind has no access to is that this previous experience was microseconds ago, not months or years; it is not in your long-term memory and there is no match.
If a dream that shares enough characteristics with the moment is readily recalled (e.g., it is especially memorable because of some circumstances in your life at the time), that dream may easily end up being adjusted (partly rewritten) to fit.
If that fails, you would have a vanilla DV.
[0] Not coincidentally, this seems more common during times of mental exhaustion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Boyard_(fortification)
It was, and is, used as the setting of popular TV shows (airing since 1990), and is featured in the intro and incidental shots.
I was flying with my Dad in the dream and we were above what looked like a river. We had a discussion and then thought it would be fun to drop in to the river and walk through it. Before we dropped in during the dream there were these strange fortifications through out the river that looked like image links I shared but does not look like the images in the wiki. They weren't as tall and they were not as bright looking.
There was no context for the dream. But the interesting thing was how memorable it was. Only about 6 dreams per year are memorable for me.
On the other hand, the brain generates everything that we perceive in real life what prevents it from achieving the same level of realism in dreams?
http://www.lucidity.com/slbbs/
In short: Pre-arranged eye patterns have been successfully executed while in a lucid dream state.
The article was quite vague about what signals the head direction neurons normally respond to, but this paper [1] seems to suggest that they respond to head-rotation information from the horizontal semicircular canals - in transgenic mice which lack functional horizontal canals, "the neural network for the head direction signal remains intact in these mice, but that the absence of normal horizontal canals results in an inability to control the network properly and brings about an unstable head direction signal."
As we know that the head-direction signals in sleeping mice are not caused by head movement, one of the first questions I would have is whether we can figure out what, if anything, they are responding to - or whether they are like the unstable signals of the transgenic mice. Unfortunately, one cannot ask a mouse to imagine that it is rotating its head and see whether that triggers the head direction cells, but in a setup where the mouse's body and its visual field can be rotated independently, it might be possible to figure out the causal chains (For all I know, this is already well-understood.) If the head direction signals are the unstable output of a network disconnected from its when-awake inputs, and the eye movements are in response to that, they may have nothing to do with dreams.
If Blumberg is right, could dreams be the result of conscious minds trying to make sense of the sort of test signals he proposes?