Hacker News Reader

Comment by themoonisachees | Hacker News Reader

One of our clients used to have a sysadmin with a knack for 192.169/16. Haven't had any problems yet but its bound to happen eventually.

View on HN

I personally love IP addresses in the 172.16/12 range. I have my house in that range, and I can VPN in from anywhere and never have any IP address conflicts.

EDIT: I just realized you said 192.169/16, which is definitely not available for private IPs.

I talked to someone who had to re-ip his home network because he was using a subnet of 10./8 that conflicted with his VPN/work access. It's still possible to conflict with a local network you're on, it's not that nobody ever uses a 172.16/12 block.

A company I worked for, which is basically a group of a dozen acquisitions, uses practically every RFC1918 block which makes things really annoying. 10./8 used by IT, 192.168/16 used by company X acquired in 2004, 172.17/16 used by company Y acquired in 2011. The list of routes the VPN software installed was impressive.

I think if I were VPNing from a campus or an office, things would be different. Hotels, coffee shops, and corporate guest networks all seem to either like 10/8 or 192.168/16.

By the way, I use 172.30/16 for my home net. I have personally seen use of 172.16/16 and 172.31/16 before.

I work for a place that legitimately has 192.16.64.0/21, it's caused occasional confusion when folks aren't looking really closely.

Hey... I have an address in that block... >:[

That addr rings a bell.. Is it owned by github by any chance?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com