How to build a nuclear warning for 10,000 years’ time
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200731-how-to-build-a-n...
How to build a nuclear warning for 10,000 years’ time
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200731-how-to-build-a-n...
Assuming civilization collapses or regress to pre-industrial levels where the concept of radiation is lost, any future group trying to extract this mythical energy source would have to first discover the location of something buried so deep underground, and then have to develop the logistics to try and access it with manpower. If the repository is placed in the middle of a desert, the challenge of providing water to the workers would be substantial. If they placed it in Antarctica, simply getting there and keeping the workers from freezing to death would be so monumentally expensive that it would bankrupt any civilization attempting to do so. Even if industrialized capacity does return, it would still be economically monumental to try and get to the waste repository. There is also a decent chance that a future civilization with said capacity would rediscover the concept and dangers of radiation.
When I talk about expense, I also like to highlight this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Menkaure Here is a project to dismantle a pyramid that was canceled because of how expensive it was and because of how little of a return on investment the endeavor appeared to be.
Seems to be highly irresponsible to leave poisonous garbage around no matter what.
Given how distributed knowledge now is, it's pretty ridiculous to think that nuclear will be completely forgotten.
[0]: https://youtu.be/aoy_WJ3mE50
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onkalo_spent_nuclear_fuel_repo...
In 10,000 years most the the really dangerous nuclear waste would have decayed. In addition, nuclear waste is a local problem. It won’t magically spread to a large area.
Cadmium, lead, arsenic would probably all be more dangerous than 10,000 year old nuclear waste.
You don't need to, because long before that it will have become economical to reprocess the "waste" (much of which is not "waste" at all, it contains usable fuel), and what is left over after that is only dangerous for a much shorter time.
(thanks, tineye, for 'sort by oldest' and keeping 404ed results)