There's no denying the guy is a blow-hard loudmouth with an obnoxious style and some dumb opinions, but that's no reason to blindly believe the inverse of everything he says. Personally I ignore his videos; not because he's always wrong, but rather because he's always annoying.
I used to watch this guy religiously (lol) back in the day, and while I still occasionally see what he has to say about certain topics, I find him hard to watch because of what seems to be a lack of humility. Last year I unsubbed.
Yeah, some of the stuff he critiques is really stupid (ex. solar roadways), especially when it comes to Kickstarter scams, but his general attitude suggests that no one should ever test insane ideas for the sake of it. I get that reusable rockets have already been achieved, for instance, but Thunderf00t seems to think that's a reason to dismiss the efforts of SpaceX, as if nothing could have possibly been improved upon since the 1990s. He has a real bias towards governmentalized academia, and he's even admitted it more or less in the past, which is why he frequently criticizes commercialization of technology.
It's too bad, because he's a really smart guy, and used to make very good points against organized religion. He could be inspiring more people to get into science, but he's now in the business of mocking, which isn't a compelling reason to actually become scientifically literate.
The really odd thing about his critiques is that he doesn't actually attack the heart of the problem, which is the media. As long as the mainstream media is scientifically illiterate and is so bereft of ethics that it just wants to sell attention, people will invent cockamamie ideas like the "sky hotel."
Is he really? I've yet to see a single video where he applies a significant amount of intellectual rigour.
I've seen him make so many basic mistakes in his reasoning that he's either incredibly lazy, intentionally misleading (a real possibility since "debunking" gets him views) or just not that smart.
I dont understand why so many people take him seriously. I suspect too many people get a kick out of feeling smart/smug from "debunking" videos.
I wouldn't discount his STEM knowledge.
The "he" audunw refers to in the comment you are responding to is Thunderf00t.
You guys are talking by each other.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DXpLAB5219A
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwbd1qGvTeQ
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ4KoxeTu-8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9g3eXLwH9J8
I will take your words by face value and assume that none of these videos used or needed any amount of intellectual rigor and that he is not very smart. Okay, but if the bar is that high, then it appears that whatever scam kickstarter he debunks wasn't even on the scale of intellectual rigor or smartness.
The real problem is that a lot of people buy into this crap.
As you get further and further away from dehumidifier scams, the debunking becomes more speculative because there is a non zero chance that the project delivers something even if the hype and marketing are all wrong. Debunking hype and reigning in expectations isn't the same as debunking the concept. If spin launch is only ever going to deliver tiny payloads to orbit it is guaranteed to find some underwhelming niche and become just another boring business among hundreds of thousands of others.
Criticism can be valid even without credentials, especially in an area where the only people with relevant credentials are putting their hand out and seeking startup funding.
I can judge whether a honey is good or not, but I'm not a bee and I can't make any myself.
This is 7th grade physics, centrifugal force, newtons laws, kinetic energy and a small amount of materials science.
People just get swayed by fancy CGI