On the contrary, it's your cavalier viewpoint which is in the global minority.
I'll engage with your dismissive, bad faith argument for the sake of earnestly inquisitive bystanders: no, we are not "forced to work" but we are compelled to do so under an economic systems which, at its leaf nodes, enforces noncompliance with violence. Try thinking through a few nth-order consequences of chronic unemployment.
As for the "particular job" aspect, no it's not that one (1) "particular job" is the requisite, but to attain particular living standards, one can't realistically look outside categories of jobs that share particular aspects. So think of it not as "a particular job," but rather a particular category of jobs which pay enough, in the right regions, for the right qualifications.
So, really, I am referring to a limited category and a structural eventuality, while you are referring to "a particular job at gunpoint." I think your extrapolations have imported greater histrionics than my original post.