Amazon’s health ambitions clashed with medical best practices, nurses say
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
>The former telehealth nurse remembered an Amazon staffer telling her, “You know, a lot of people here consider you the warehouse workers of Amazon Care.”
I don't really want the person treating me to have a warehouse worker's skill set, and be evaluated on a warehouse worker's criteria.
Happens more often than you think, even outside Amazon.
Amazon's cost cutting race-to-the-bottom approach needs to stay as far away from the general population as possible.
While I do welcome a company like Amazon getting into the pharmacy space and using their power to lower drug costs, the potential for abuse is too great.
And that's without mentioning the staff of trained nurses and health professionals being managed under the same approach Amazon takes to manage its warehouse workers....
Unless Amazon was spending to R&D new medicine, lobbying to reduce patent lengths, or constructing their own manufacturing facilities, there was no margin to be had here.
Walmart/Costco/CVS/Walgreens already have the dispensing of medicines to public down to single digit profit margins.
This is always true in every health facility I have ever seen or worked in - but Amazon doesn't have the licence to practice medicine or nursing, the doctor or nurse does. So the final decision-maker of what's appropriate is the clinician, it's their job to do the right thing, and bring up these issues with the medical or nursing director. And if you really think the clinical director is doing the wrong thing for patients, you report them to the state regulator which should also give you whistleblower protection in most states in the US, not just whine about it anonymously after you leave the company