Yeah I realized that, but still it feels sloppy or disingenuous when you consider the extent of the subject matter.
It's supposed to be an article about Freedom, Privacy and financial communication, not specifically about Bitcoin (or is it?).
It's supposed to be an article about Freedom, Privacy and financial communication, not specifically about Bitcoin (or is it?).
> It's supposed to be an article about Freedom, Privacy and financial communication, not specifically about Bitcoin (or is it?).
Dergigi is a Bitcoin maximalist
Here's their book: 21 Lessons: What I've Learned from Falling Down the Bitcoin Rabbit Hole https://www.amazon.com/dp/B083L93MJ7/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_ZN4ZBQ...
Like you can have the exact same text and replace BTC with XMR and it is equally valid, if not more.