Electric Vehicles as a Subscription
autonomy.com
autonomy.com
While the deposit is refundable, the start fee doesn’t appear to be. So in 1yr, your total outlay is $16,680 for a $48,600 car. That’s essentially a 3 year payoff + 500 for deposits, and you don’t end up with a car after.
It’s not immediately clear what the advantage is here, I guess unless you can’t qualify for a regular car loan. But the equity cost here is very high.
They claim a loan on this car at 4.25% would cost 1900/mo, but it’s more like 1300. And Tesla financing is as low as 2.9%, which is 1277/mo if you put 4500 down. Those go to 1203/mo and 1178/mo respectively if you put down 7900.
I dunno. Nothing about this seems like a particularly good deal or good for it’s users. They don’t get the tax credits, they don’t get the equity, they just get a more economical rental. It doesn’t even look like there’s a purchase option in the end like a regular lease.
Maybe I’m being cynical here, and I will admit I have never quite understood the appeal of leasing anyway, but this concept just totally escapes me, and the numbers don’t make a good deal of sense to me either.
At the end of 7 years, you can expect the car to be worth more than $20k (obviously depends on usage).
That's $17k in present value.
That reduces you're real payment to ~$410/m.
This is way worse for cash-flow. Way worse short-term, and obviously worse long-term, too.
I'm not sure how companies like this can find customers.
Between the 3 groups, the company might be able to find enough customers to make it happen. Given the egregious profit margins baked into their model, they don't even need to find that many to make it happen.
At $20K, the first auto loan calculator I tried estimates a $278 payment, zero down, ignoring resale value.
Unless this service lets you switch EV types at will (sedan, SUV, compact, truck, rivian, etc...), I really don't see the point of paying the startup fee.
Still doesn’t seem worth Autonomy’s prices to me though.
$6000 to start and $500 a month sounds like the terms of a car loan. If you just get a car loan for 5 years or whatever, it might even be less. But then the payment goes away! Yes there are maintenance fees, but those can be covered by insurance for vehicles under 100,000 miles. Don't forget modern cars are generally extremely reliable, and anybody can easily google the reliability of a specific model. Unless you're one of the very few Americans living in a dense urban center, you probably should just buy a car instead. And while it loses value considerably once off the lot, at least you have some sort of net worth intact at the end of a few year term.
Unless your Social Credit score gets too low. In that case, you'll get a free trip to the re-education camp.
Like leasing, this comes with the downsides of car ownership (maintenance, fuel, parking) without the upside of "equity". Based on the submission title, I was expecting something more akin to ZipCar (but only electric vehicles).
Funny, I got a ZipCard and never used it.
In your own "subscription" autonomous EV when it quietly locks all doors and reroutes to the nearest facility.
You won't have noticed though; too distracted by the UberHD++ remaster of 2001: A Space Odyssey playing on the holographic windscreen.
In all seriousness, though, I'm currently car-shopping, and I would gladly pay a massive premium for a car with the minimum-viable amount of electronic/connected nonsense.
As far as I can tell, the only legally-required bit of electronic shenanigans is the backup cameras. I'd love a car that just had that, mechanical switches for everything else, and some USB-C/USB-A/aux ports where I can plug in my devices.
Increasingly, this is true of ICE vehicles, too. It's why I've pretty much given up on the idea of having a new car at all.
I can't see this being used by anything other than short term rentals and corporations who like stable expenses.
They did raise their prices recently, but from my calculation it still seemed like a fair offer and it's something I'd use.
Except that's not allowed. Zipcar is (was?) exactly the same thing as a car rental. You pay for all the time you're in possession of the car. You're not allowed to return the car anywhere except the exact location you picked it up from.
What was the advantage supposed to be?
Zipcar involved looking for the nearest location in the app (typically a few blocks away, if near SF), picking your car and timeframe, showing up, and driving away. Fuel is included, just use the included credit card. No human contact or upselling required, and you can return the car at 3am.
If you only need a car for a few hours, Zipcar is much more efficient than a traditional rental.
Im additionally curious how this sub model works because of the ev infrastructure - sure you can always charge it at a public place (know people who do this) but for convenience a home charging setup seems like a reasonable investment. And if one is going to do that they may as well purchase the vehicle.
My house, my car, my bike
Subscription handcuffs are the opposite of autonomy.
150 euros / month, then 0.13 € / KM.
I payed a whopping total of 650€ for 2 months. And they’re is no string attached at all.
Edit : I know it’s not the same category than a Tesla ( by far … )
But a new Dacia spring cost 12k€, with government discount on EV, it’s roughly the same price as the deposit for this service.
But then you’re driving a cube of plastic. I like it.
The fact that they only have Tesla vehicles seems to indicate that Tesla is executing where other manufacturers are not able to.
I think it says more about the subscription company than it does about Tesla. It may imply a bias towards Tesla, a private negated deal, or an investor requirement.