Bacteriophages the Modern Way
science.org
science.org
The most well-known name in this list is Arm & Hammer.
They are much easier to mass produce than phages.
So I don't think so but not much research has been done in the west on phages since the invention of antibiotics.
Most phage therapy I have seen/heard of is related to wound care and bacteria that is causing intractable antibiotic resistant infections (either superficial or potentially respiratory). In these environments immune cells cant really effectively do their immune actions (because of the debris, and because a necessary function of effective immunity is effective circulation).
A good going blood borne infection being attacked by bacteriophages would be scary to treat someone through… intravascular bacteria being lysed causes a generalised inflammatory response that amongst other things is hyper coagulable
There are multiple different detection mechanisms.
There's more than enough "I'm being attacked" signalling from the cells attacked by the actual bacteria the phage was meant to address - which is generally about where we also want the phage to be.
Note that 10% of a human's weight and 90% of the cell count are those symbiotic gut bacteria.
We don't have only one species of bacteria in our gut, and even if it was possible to for it mutate to infect one kind of bacteria in out digestive system it's unlikely (like winning the lottery, a few dozens of times) the phage can can mutations to target all of them. In any case, damages to the human symbiotic bacteria already happens with antibiotics (which damage the entirety of the flora not just a single species).
> Note that 10% of a human's weight
This sounds really fishy.
1. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/antibiotics-can-kill-... 2. https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/07/maybe-not-so-fast-wi...