It should be noted that JK Rowling does not identify as a transphobe.
It should be noted that JK Rowling does not identify as a transphobe.
IIRC (same caveat) she's being called that as a result of excluding trans women from her definition of women.
If this was about logic (rather than the way certain labels are applied and can become terms of abuse divorced from their original context[0]), then that would imply she was objecting to being called a "radical feminist".
[0] e.g. "artificial", "hysteria", and arguably "Lucifer"
Take the word "woman". Until recently, it had a definition clearly understood by everyone (see Kindergarten Cop). But now, if you don't agree with the redefinition you're labeled a TERF/transphobe.
I can barely remember any of Kindergarten Cop let alone trans issues, but a random film, no matter how entertaining, barely tells you about general culture, let alone what is "clearly understood by everyone" — it's not like the popularity of the MCU is evidence of "everyone" being pagans even though it features a race of gods as main characters.