The only thing that seems annoying about Tesla is the A/C is toggled via the screen.
Otherwise it has those same controls for changing songs/volume/assist on the wheel.
The only thing that seems annoying about Tesla is the A/C is toggled via the screen.
Otherwise it has those same controls for changing songs/volume/assist on the wheel.
Every car I've owned in the last 10 years has had this feature, except it's tied to the key fob, so there's no tapping beyond unlocking the door. If they truly have to tap a few times just to get an electric seat into their saved position, then Tesla screwed that up (but I'm pretty sure Tesla ties those settings to the owner's smartphone/key).
My friends wife only drives once in a while so I doubt they have to change from the default preset often.
But I’m pretty sure it’s universally agreed on HN Tesla took the touch screen thing too far.
This was a feature on a truck my dad bought in like 2002. It was mapped to physical buttons near the seat controls. Tapping a few times is a regression.
If you open the driver's door with your key fob in your pocket, your presets are loaded and the seats and mirrors move to what you want. If your spouse opens the driver's door with their key fob, everything changes to their settings. If you have more than 2 drivers, you can buy extra key fobs at the dealer (expensive!!) and the car will keep track of settings for those too.
It's not just luxury cars that do this ;)
I found the car related announcements in Apple's most recent WWDC key note monumental in their reach. Many manufacturers signed on (notably except Tesla, Mazda, BMW) to support the next version of Car Play, which in a sense might reflect a surrender of the UX ownership:
> Ford, Lincoln, Mercedes-Benz, Infiniti, Honda, Acura, Jaguar, Land Rover, Audi, Nissan, Volvo, Porsche, and more
https://www.macrumors.com/2022/06/06/apple-announces-multi-d...