It's mostly a cost saving measure.
Physical buttons are expensive. I you eliminate them, the car gets cheaper to make.
That's all.
It's a sign of low quality and I expect that in 5 to 10 years, consumers will start to realise this.
It's mostly a cost saving measure.
Physical buttons are expensive. I you eliminate them, the car gets cheaper to make.
That's all.
It's a sign of low quality and I expect that in 5 to 10 years, consumers will start to realise this.
There are also reliability expectations. If I need defrost because the windshield just fogged over, it better activate when I turn that knob on my sixteen year old car. And so far, it always has.
Years ago when I was working in IT at FoMoCo I recall seeing a piece of paper on an office bulletin board outlining how they had managed to save like $40 on the production cost of a Taurus, a vehicle that at the time was about $20,000. Those savings were the result of multiple sub-$1 to several dollar cost savings tweaks made between production years.
Ford has built something like 8 million Tauri, save a few dollars on each of them and it adds up to real money, like enough to redecorate the executive cafeteria.
Gluing a single tablet is much faster.
My favourite feature of touchscreens in cars is when you try to click a button but go over a bump[1] so your finger misses and you press something else. Genius.
I do get that touchscreens allow manufactures to add and remove controls though.
Rolling out UI changes for self-driving cars, like getting rid of the, knob behind the wheel, will help with safety no end.
1. Not sure what the bump was, probably the neighbour's kid or dog or something. Too busy trying to get the latest Smartless. That Will Arnet, what a card, etc, etc...
I'm not so hopeful. The same can be said about household appliances. Yet more and more random things figure they should have touchscreens, or at the very least touch buttons. And this trend has lasted for far more than 10 years.
Consumers is the key word here. Manufacturers already know that buttons have the "disadvantage" that they break independently. They are also easier to fix with a generic replacement part. Which means that you won't have to scrap your car because it suddenly became unusable.
Force manufacturers to provide replacement parts for 25 years after original purchase, and see them flocking back to the basics. But that prob. won't happen in EU (because it's against the interests of Germany) or USA (because "communism"). So I guess we're depending on the common sense of Japanese and Korean manufacturers?