Hacker News Reader

It feels like a joke, how is this possible.

I can understand investing big in people but Adam would be the last person I would trust to be successful. The lack of owning responsibility in the failure of WeWork is a huge red flag. Why would A16Z give their largest investment to him?

View on HN

It's pretty much guaranteed returns. This investment is a no brainer if you are able to get in very early.

The subsequent rounds are where there's little to no chance of success.

The only thing I can think of is because the co-founder has the same last name as what’s in the VC name.

Maybe that’s standard practice for VC to be named co-founder in this circumstance?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com