I noticed this was very different in different cultures. For example, when I went to Singapore, there was lots of Chinese vegetarian food and lots of Indian vegetarian food. The Chinese vegetarian food almost
always used mock meat, while the Indian vegetarian food never did.
Personally, as a vegetarian for over three decades, I have sometimes been grossed out by realistic meat substitutes, but sometimes found them palatable and even appealing. Just a few days ago I ate a mock meat sandwich from The Butcher's Son in Berkeley that I enjoyed quite a bit (even though it's not very similar to anything I would normally eat most of the time).
I suspect this question is pretty complicated and varies a lot from place to place, person to person, and time to time. For instance, it might be different for people who associated meat with celebrations and feasts and then gave it up somewhat reluctantly, and for people who found meat unpleasant and unappetizing and always preferred eating other things. These two people would naturally have different cultural and emotional associations to the act of eating (something that seems quite a lot like) meat.
So I'd encourage people working in the vegetarian food industry to pursue both tracks: make mock meats that are more and more realistic, and also show people that things that are not very meat-like at all can be appealing and interesting to eat.