https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/lifeti...
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/lifeti...
Cars last 100k+ miles now, and that 13k break-even number in your link is with the current US energy mix, which is rapidly decarbonizing. It is a big deal, and worth moving to EVs.
- traditional well in the US
- fracking in the US
- offshore
- Canadian tarsands
Edit: This article has some interesting information on Energy Return on Investment (EROI)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151...
Yes many do. Some are written off in their first year.
The main point is if we all miraculously switched to EVs, there are savings in emissions to be had, but it wont fix the problem.
This is the whole problem. Its only a small step forward but people think it'll make a huge difference. Ideally people would move to a small urban apartment and walk or take public transport. EVs let people continue to drive and think they're OK.
There is so much FUD out there from the professional astroturfers and the cranky old amateurs. But EVs will follow the path that solar and wind are: the sheer economics will sweep away ICEs in inexorable fashion.
source for this? the article you linked doesn't seem to provide lifetime carbon emissions, nor does a 20k mile break-even point imply that there "isn't a huge difference" in lifetime emissions
https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_emissions.html shows the difference in annual emissions
https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/news/a... debunks the myth that the tesla battery is worth 8 years of driving, but still says its a bit over 2 years.