Covid-19 lab-leak theory debunked by Australian professor
abc.net.au
abc.net.au
That falls short of "totally proves the lab wasn't involved," which seems to be the only assumption that doesn't make one a dangerous conspiracy theorist.
I said it in Feb 2020: I think someone at that lab got told to destroy some bats, decided that "sell them at the market" was close enough, and the fun began. I dunno how much more talk about "it started at the market" will be required before we can move on to "but where did the infected animals at the market come from?"
To your point, there's still no proof, only "likely". The guy had a theory prior. Now it appears as if he predicted the future. That's it. That's all there is. His self-bias is not proof.
It's these type of "scientist" and this type of "journalism" that gives science and journalism a bad name.
At this point, I'm deeply skeptical of any attempts to prove anything about COVID origins, short of maybe some leaked records or something.
Any epi analysis is based on known cases which is horribly naive when approaching this subject.
I realize this sounds closed minded or something but to me it's just a matter of time. Too much time passed, with too much interference from too many parties, to make much sense of it.
With respect to where did the infection come from if we all agree it spread from the market, what I can say living on a farm is that viruses and bad ones can and do mutate and leap between humans and other animals.
Origin in the lab or market aside, for the sake of humanity these types of unsanitary conditions of animals and people in close proximity needs to end as does the notion of eating inadequately prepared and cooked bush meat.
Trash-loving mice and rats are close bat relatives, and frequently carry diseases from other species to humans.
https://apnews.com/article/covid-science-health-china-pandem...
That's multiple clusters in stalls at the market. Even with cases with no known link to the market, still "There was this extraordinary pattern where the highest density of cases was both extremely near to and very centered on this market."
Also, there's the fact that two different strains appeared in humans. Besides the existence of multiple strains, they were also different enough that the virologist (in this ABC article) says it proves that mutation had to have already been ongoing in animal populations, "and it's mutated amongst them before it jumped to humans."