> English-only, global (…)
That must be a record for quickest contradiction.
Unless by “global” they mean… no, I’m stumped.
That must be a record for quickest contradiction.
Unless by “global” they mean… no, I’m stumped.
Yes you can, and that has been standard practice on the Internet since forever.
Things are much better now with Unicode etc., you will still run into problems with things like directionality and non-Latin scripts all the time.
If English is the default language and if English support is always the highest priority compared to every other language, that’s effectively the same as saying “you can’t speak your language here”.
And it works the other way around too. If you build something local and support only the languages used locally, you’re effectively saying to everyone else, “you can’t use your language here”.
> Yes you can, and that has been standard practice on the Internet since forever.
Visst, klart du kan säga så, men andra kan lika väl strunta i det. Och tala om för dig att du beter dig som en översittare och ett arsel. Översittar-arslen har alltid funnits, det är inget nytt.
Also, “global” doesn’t have to mean “relevant and accessible to every single person in the world”. It could also be the opposite of “local”, for example, and describe the kind of content you can find, rather the kind of people.
I subscribe to a global streaming service of Hindi content.
Niin sinä luulet. Liegst falsch, mon cher.