> What kind of people adopt a pet, and then release it into the wild?
Have you seen how much litter people throw on the ground? I think you might be giving the average person too much credit.
Have you seen how much litter people throw on the ground? I think you might be giving the average person too much credit.
Unless you're talking about litter as in garbage.
But if you think dumping helpless animals under your care to fend for themselves is morally equivalent to littering, I'm not even sure what to say to that. It's not even in the same ballpark.
I'm really not sure what is so objectionable about asserting that animal abuse is not the same thing as littering.
I own a Norwegian forest cat he was a stray and then found and neutered as an adult. I pretty much know that he could survive just fine on his own by hunting rodents, which he sometimes does anyway. But I still wouldn't leave him to fend for himself because I know he's much happier as a pet and I also just don't want him to leave. That's the part I don't really get. And I'm not some bleeding heart animals should have human rights type person either. Even though squirrels are cute, I'm not shedding tears while cleaning one up that the cat brought in. It's a wild animal that got killed by a predator. That's just nature.
I don't understand the emotional calculus of doing thing to an animal you've lived with and taken care of for months. And I really don't think that is normal at all.
It’s the first part in the HN guidelines for comments:
“Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.”
Be less concerned with your internet points.
Good point, I've been mildly about about that me too in some cases (I'm sbd else)
Without commenting on the amount of badness, the point is that they're both bad things that people nonetheless manage to regularly do.