Serious question: why is MG Siegler taken seriously at all? So far as I know he has no credentials, is incapable of actual analysis, and takes forever to get to the point. Am I missing something?
I've always assumed it's because his hyperbole incites reaction, lots of comments and all that. His articles mostly end up being completely worthless and sensational in my opinion. I try to avoid them, but occasionally I stop in to check and it's always the same reaction, "Oh, he's still doing that."
He is a good writer, great analyst and knows how to get to the point. You just feel offended when someone is right and you can't cope with it.
Great analyst? He's basically an apple PR personnel. Most of his posts van be summed up into Apple can do no wrong. Anyone opposing apple is wrong and stupid. There is no logic. It's blatant and it's almost like he does it for page views
He is an okay writer. Has highly biased opinions which dictate his analysis. I seldom write things that are non critical of Apple.