I wish I could organize my thoughts
drewdevault.com
drewdevault.com
If you want your grid to be even more interesting, integrate Eagle Mode around it (i.e. install and skim the Eagle Mode docs) for harnessing the powerful & more or less universal taxonomy of a filesystem. You'd have multiple levels of zoom & pan workspaces there, since it will preview the PDFs as you zoom to their location.
So, if you want to wait for something to fit the spec to your inner-critic's liking, I guess that's one thing. But if you could get most of the way toward what you want within a day...even though it wouldn't be perfect...would that be worth trying?
There's also a Patreon for Inkscape development IIRC...
With focus modes, you can hide everything else and make the iPad into a dedicated note keeping device.
As a daily user of Linux on the desktop I am totally biased -- but can you provide some examples of this? From my (subjective) perspective, Linux desktop software is pretty active.
However, I totally agree with your point about Linux being an afterthought for a lot of desktop apps and made possible only by tooling comparable to Electron.
Some points I could see:
1. I still can't ditch X-11 for work (because of Zoom[1])
2. My point above about desktop Linux support being an afterthought for most desktop apps
However, I feel like on the other side there is a huge desktop application library that is pretty active.
[1] https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/6634039380877-Shar...
What's an example of a desktop Linux application that is so good that somebody will setup or buy a Linux machine to run? I don't deny they exist, but it's been almost 15 years since I worked in Linux full time and when I did I mostly used cross-platform software. Off the top of my head, I just can't think of anything. The killer app back then for me was Linux itself mostly because I enjoyed tinkering and configuring and I couldn't afford the machines I really wanted (something from SGI or Sun or Next).
Despite all that, Linux may be the most successful OS out there. It's the foundation for Android and ChromeOS, it powers a bazillion appliances and gadgets. It's basic infrastructure for a lot of what powers everything we do online. But I don't consider any of that to be desktop Linux success stories.
These are great examples.
> What's an example of a desktop Linux application that is so good that somebody will setup or buy a Linux machine to run?
This is a tough question as most of the software I use on Linux can be used on MacOS with its ancient FreeBSD userland or Windows with WSL or natively. I feel that often developers who don't treat Linux as an afterthought also make things available for other platforms.
I know for me, I use a Linux machine for the software ecosystem I use to keep things keyboard driven. skhd[1] on MacOS and Autohotkey[2] on Windows can help but when I have tried both it is not quite as flushed out in my opinion. I also use Linux for increased privacy and a more minimal environment compared to MacOS or Windows. I would say those are compelling reasons to use Linux and are directly impacted by software available for Linux. One could also argue the lack of undesirable software (bloatware, adware, etc.) is also a compelling reason to use Linux.
This all being said, I am not one to argue this is the year of the Linux Desktop. I'm a security engineer and the lack of standardization on the desktop side of Linux is a HUGE weakness and until that is addressed I don't think it will ever be the year of the Linux Desktop.
(I just got an S7 lite, on sale). I like it a lot so far, but I've only had it for two days so I dont want to comment on using the pen until I've had the tablet for more time.)
I think my ideal environment would be more of a pen-based org mode with good handwriting recognition and editing.
I think there are about five thousand projects that try to do exactly this. Omnigraffle comes to mind, so does OneNote which I hated because I don't want any of this infinite canvas stuff in my note app.
* there's a limit but I really never run against it in practice
Unfortunately in this case it (paradoxically) enhanced the click-bait factor immensely. An impressive feat if it was intentional on behalf of the submitter.
C'est la vie, but posting such drivel dilutes his unique brand. Based on what we know about his personality, I suspect he doesn't care whether he wasted our time blasting out app feature complaint articles or not. Plus it is his blog, after all. It's no longer clear what level of consideration he ascribes to our attention.
Thanks for the feedback and ideas kyleee, I'll take them under advisement.
The benefit of writing things down is it forces you to organize and clarify.
What would be the benefit of this collection of random musings?
It's extremely flexible and fairly easy to configure. I've moved 90% of my visual notes there.
P.S. Then I used it for a few days and realized the platform itself didn't help that much. It's actually the act of writing/thinking that gets the ideas rollin around in my own head, that's the real useful part.
I think the most unsolved part is the layout of arrows. I've never used any drawing or flowcharting program that could connect items at the speed of thought. You always spend time fiddling with the pathing of connector lines.
The auto-OCR feature is tricky too. You don't want to waste time clicking the Rect tool to draw a rectangle.
but how long does that really take? maybe it'll be more useful to develop some patience?
also, as we get older, we get slower. I recall watching my dad use a computer with such pause that I found it infuriating. Now (decades later) I find that I now pause sometimes rather than rush because I have so many more things on my mind.
Another one might be true immersive development and or debugging.
I think the visceral sense of scale and spatial relationship might be a great leap forward in productivity.
I think I'd you could navigate a code base in 3D, we could use that part of brain that's subconsciously really good at directions to increase familiarity more rapidly.
The database schemas are up the stairs to the left, second door. (Or in the cave passed the willow tree, lol)
I've noticed after a few hours in a new games my brain has the map and I have to think less about where I'm going and more about my surroundings.
If we can tie into these "coprocessor" parts of our brain, how easier could hard things like math and engineering become for more people?
Random thiughts but the 1000th note taking app won't bring us closer but VR just might.
Secondly, all metaphors must eventually give way to a new conception of operation to realize the power of the thing. Manila folders don't cut it when you think about symlinks, loopback mounts, serialization, and all the gazillion other ways we use files now. in the metaverse we might start with houses, or plazas, but it can't be where we stop.
I thought the Zettelkasten hype would show more people that when it comes to organization and notetaking we need better ways to get things out than in. And when comes to the idea of "automatically linking" notes and ranking concepts within those notes based on importance or value there's no such thing as "one size fits all." Ideas and innovations in that area, maintenance, search, and surfacing relevant (forgotten) notes are far more interesting problems.
(No affiliation)
Math always just seemed like one of those things that should be doable on a computer, but you just can't really do it efficiently without being able to draw numbers, lines, and other stuff all over the place, like you can on paper.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Humane_Interface
https://archive.org/details/humaneinterfacen00rask
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooming_user_interface
https://josephernest.github.io/bigpicture.js/index.html
Also "Glamorous Toolkit" https://gtoolkit.com/ an extension of Pharo (Smalltalk).
- - - -
To me the weird thing is that this kind of app has so much overhead to roll out, that it's not e.g. a simple Red script or something ( https://www.red-lang.org/ ), or already just the way your computer works (the Canon Cat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_Cat Raskin again.)
Forgot the most important and annoying disadvantage of writing in journals: Search. The whole point of writing is that it is a record that you can at some point in the future benefit from. If you can't search, it is nfg. While some people write to better memorize what they're learning (college students), that's not what author is talking about. Inability to swiftly search things is probably the biggest drawback of writing in notebooks.
As it is, I usually just use org-mode for thought organization. When I need to give a presentation to co-workers, I type up some talking points in org-mode and may just spend an hour or two arranging them into a cohesive narrative. I've been praised for presentations I've made this way. Of course presentations aren't the only things I prepare for using org-mode -- I've written entire pieces of software from inside it.
1. Notes on the map can be connected to each other via arrows that show relationships 2. Notes can act as containers for other notes, so you're not limited to the 2D plane the author describes -- you can "zoom in" by opening a note and you'll be presented with a map view of that note's contents.
Similar idea that I liked but couldn't fully get into: