LiveDrive terminates Backify contract, users don't have access to their backup
plus.google.com
plus.google.com
LiveDrive could have gotten massive goodwill if they did this, even if they offered to transition the data to another service.
This complete loss of information is brutal and I would stay away from LiveDrive as they don't know how to properly handle important relationships.
The situation should be explained in detail and an open letter by LiveDrive stating what is going wrong with Backify. This would have informed users of the situation and of Backify's actions. I believe that the data loss could have been avoided even if Backify's owners were acting fraudulently.
The problem is that all those users' backups are (probably) stored away as insurance against a possible future data-loss event. So for LiveDrive to offer a useful service to these customers they'd have to undertake to continue to provide access to the backups for some extended period of time. Without that kind of undertaking the backup data is not worth very much - the user would be running the risk that their hard drive goes pop the day after LiveDrive finally decide to end supporting the old Backify users.
Another way of looking at it: if I've just done a routine backup of my machine through Backify, downloading all that data again is probably the last thing I want to do (unless my machine just blew up). What I want is for someone to look after it until I do need it.
The people who get screwed here are people who just lost data, or who lose data before they can switch providers. All LiveDrive really needs to do is make the data available for a short time to cover those people. A month would be more than enough, and probably even just a week would do it.
Livedrive really threw Backify under the bus, and Backify really proved that a single level of redundancy isn't enough. Blame to go all around, although I feel bad for Backify.
LD completely dropped the ball here, regardless of what Backify did or didn't do wrong.
And it's complete BS, since I can see the files in tact on my hard drive. The problem is that the local LD cache uses sequentially numbered folders and arbitrary file names with no extensions... so manually recovering the locally stored files would be a monumental task.
Are you certain (and when I say "certain", I mean not just speculating about how things were set up between LiveDrive and Backify) that LiveDrive are able to tell, without a shadow of a doubt, which files belong to which Backify clients? This could be a potential legal nightmare for LiveDrive if they were to end up giving access to someone's backups to the wrong person.
To echo everyone else here as well, LiveDrive really missed a chance to 'step up' here.
If anyone is looking for an alternative, I highly recommend Crashplan. It's been my offsite solution for a while now, and I couldn't be happier.
"First of all we would like to thank you for using Backify. We hope you really liked our service and enjoyed using it. We regret to inform you that we can not provide free backup services anymore. All free Backify accounts will be closed on November 22, 2011.
In order to prevent your account from deletion, please login into [sic] your account and update your Billing Details.
[HUGE GREEN "UPDATE BILLING DETAILS" BUTTON]
Once again, we thank you for using Backify. Please update your billing details before November 22, 2011 to continue using the service."
Which is right?
1) LiveDrive are a well respected, well known company with a good history of service and customer support. I use them as my main backup service (I never actually used Backify, just wanted to see what it was like) and trust them as such.
2) I just tried to log into my account and can't =)
If LiveDrives concerns about cards have some substance last nights message might have been a last ditch attempt at getting as much information as possible
It isn't something I'd recommend to a non-techie though (backups are something you have to get right, and not everyone has cocked up enough to call themselves "experienced"!), it isn't free, and I don't get room to have hundreds of Gb of stuff backed up (though if I needed that, I could just rent larger VMs or even an inexpensive dedicated server), but I'm not beholden to a single company for my data's persistence.
There is a chunk of stuff that I don't backup off-site in this way but do backup offline at home (photos and MP3s for instance) and a large chunk of stuff that I don't backup at all (large media files that I could re-obtain from elsewhere as easily as I could draw back down from an offsite backup, should the RAID array fail in a way it can't survive or I cock up and accidentally delete stuff).
What the hell? Why not give people some time to get their data out? I know one thing for sure, I'll never store my backups with either Backify or LiveDrive.
From what others have said, I'm inclined to agree with LiveDrive. We'll see what ultimately happens though.
The software is "white-lable" by account settings, I.E. if you log into LiveDrive application with a Backify account, the branding will be Backify.
This is speculation on my part, but it is probably because "No contract exists between [Backify's users] and Livedrive". If Backify's relationship with Livedrive ended badly, then Livedrive has no obligation to give people time to backup their already-backed-up data. Livedrive should do the right thing, but maybe they just don't care.
Honestly, how can LiveDrive justify such damaging actions on their part?
I suppose they either do not see themselves as a "Backup" provider or they don't want to risk being seen as trying to poach Backify's customers.
"We would like to advise you not to provide any credit card information to BACKIFY.COM. If you have provided credit card information to BACKIFY.COM then we would suggest contacting your card provider and informing them that your card may be used fraudulently."
So Backify are asking you to join a payment plan with that huge green button and LiveDrive are saying not to give your details to them.
Mixed messages are never good.
But tarsnap is indeed excellent.
The main reason is that it doesn't have a daemon that watches file changes to keep a dirty list so it'd basically DDoS your desktop every time the cronjob ran to run the backup. Also for a desktop it's nice to have an interface where you can see the differences between backups.
The I/O thing is actually a problem on servers too. See if you can spot the point in this graph where cron.daily runs:
Since your graph header says 'linode', I'm assuming your servers all run Linux, and you should take a look at ionice[1]. It adjusts the IO priority of a process like 'nice' adjusts CPU priority. For example, prefixing your call like this: "ionice -c 3 tarsnap...." will give tarsnap the lowest priority access to the drive.
1. Not a big enough company. Colin might get hit by a bus.
2. Rackspace has no incoming bandwidth charges on their cloud.
People want a company with a personal touch. Why don't most companies understand this? Also, why didn't they mention one of the most popular backup services, Dropbox?
"We apologize for any inconvenience..." please rub salt in the wounds. [http://37signals.com/svn/posts/1528-the-bullshit-of-outage-l...]
* Local full backup using TimeMachine
* Remote full backup using Backblaze
* Working documents are in a Dropbox folder with my regular Documents folder serving as an archive
As an added benefit, I share a Dropbox account with another computer on my LAN, so Dropbox syncs to it extremely quickly, even when I save large files.
I feel pretty well protected with this setup, but I'm always open to scrutiny. If you see holes in my strategy, do point them out.
Can anyone confirm the existance of reseller contract?
Then I use dropbox for my working folder, this takes care of backups a little quicker and is highly convenient.
This is extremely unprofessional. Just because there is no legal relationship, that doesn't mean you should just cut everybody off.
My HTPC does the same, but to an external hard drive plugged in via USB.
Easy and quick to set up, and I don't have to rely on a third party run service.
Even if dropbox disappeared overnight I would have my data.
(feedback very welcome)
EDIT: I should mention that this site was useful -- I learned about backup providers that might fit me well that I otherwise wouldn't have known about.
Glad it was helpful.
I switched to CrashPlan and have been happy so far.
With my current usage (just over 125 GB), it would cost me $11.99 per month for Mozy. I payed CrashPlan $118.99 for 4 years of unlimited usage, or less than $2.50 per month.
Mozy essentially "fired" me as a customer. They stated that some customers were using too much data on their unlimited plan and introduced the new tiered price structure with the intention of pushing out the heavy users. Seems odd to me, since I only backup my music, photos, and important documents. I don't even backup my videos.
It just didn't make sense for me to stay with them. The idea of charging $2/month for each 20GB above 125 seems pretty steep. And since the amount I back up will grow over time, so will my month cost.
ADVISORY NOTCE FROM LIVEDRIVE REGARDING BACKIFY.COM
Dear Firstname lastname
We are writing to you regarding BACKIFY.COM who you recently created an online backup account with.
BACKIFY.COM was a reseller of Livedrive (http://www.livedrive.com) . Livedrive provided the technology and service behind the product offered to you by BACKIFY.COM.
We are writing to inform you that BACKIFY.COM is no longer a Livedrive reseller and the services that they purchased from our company on your behalf have been terminated. If you are using a service provided by BACKIFY.COM and powered by Livedrive then this service will now have stopped working.
We would also like to advise you that we have received a number of complaints about BACKIFY.COM from their customers and from industry organizations. We would like to advise you not to provide any credit card information to BACKIFY.COM. If you have provided credit card information to BACKIFY.COM then we would suggest contacting your card provider and informing them that your card may be used fraudulently. If BACKIFY.COM have charged your card for services not provided you should contact your card provider and ask them to initiate a chargeback procedure.
Please note that this advisory is being sent to you in good faith because we feel you should be informed that BACKIFY.COM is no longer a Livedrive reseller and of the complaints we have become aware of. No contract exists between yourself and Livedrive and we are not able to assist further in any dispute you may have with BACKIFY.COM.
If you have installed the online backup software provided by BACKIFY.COM we highly recommend you uninstall it from your computer by following the steps below:
On Windows
Go to Start > Settings > Control Panel and select Add/Remove Programs (or ‘Programs and settings’), select Livedrive and select uninstall.
On Mac
Go to Finder > Applications and delete the Livedrive application.
Please note that any data you backed up using BACKIFY.COM cannot be retrieved and we recommend you establish an alternative backup service immediately.
Livedrive does provide a very similar online backup service to the one provided by BACKIFY.COM and you can read more details and, if you wish, signup for a trial on our website at http://www.livedrive.com. Please note however that we do not provide a free service as BACKIFY.COM did.
Other online backup vendors you may wish to consider include:
Carbonite.com
iDrive.com
Mozy.com
We are sorry for the inconvenience this situation may have caused you.
Kind Regard
Livedrive Limited