> I’ll take my chances with lead.
Probably the most moronic thing I’ve read on HN
> I’ll take my chances with lead.
Probably the most moronic thing I’ve read on HN
> Probably the most moronic thing I’ve read on HN
is the quintessence of what the guidelines ask you not to do: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. Also, you carried it further (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426030) and that's exactly what we don't want.
Further, I like how it is on skeptics to maintain the high quality tone of a discussion, but the hegemons are somehow not accountable to conventions around civility, wit, and clarity. It's like some people have some kind of luxury-stupidity whereby someone whose opinions aren't officially protected can't afford to be that petulant.
Another commenter here observed it's a war on nitrogen with protein as a casualty, which is pretty consistent given aligned climate change initiatives.
Not at all, It's clearly pretty straight science reporting typical of Ars Technica. That nearly half a million Australians keep backyard chickens is in and of itself interesting, and those people probably want and need to know about lead risk. It may also be worth other urban chicken owners checking their soil and eggs for lead. People who live in cities and keep chickens are likely to read Ars, so it's a natural story for them to run. No conspiracy needed. The call to action is to just get your soil tested.
The local context bias is here to stay.
This would include for example, changing an article from a Florida news source saying "diabetes epidemic out of control" to "Florida reports highest level of diabetes in its history" (these are completely made up).
We have a convention to add (year) to mark the date. We should take up a convention to add [context], too; e.g.
[In Sydney] Backyard hens’ eggs contain 40 times more lead...
I tried that several times, but mods often revert that.
I wonder what @dang thinks about this.
There is some lead naturally in soil but it’s generally low levels
UMass has a lead in soil fact sheet:
https://ag.umass.edu/soil-plant-nutrient-testing-laboratory/...
“The US EPA has set a safe soil lead threshold limit of 400 ppm total lead using this method. The US EPA also recommends that soils used for gardening fall below 100 ppm total lead. In Massachusetts, the regulatory safety threshold is 200 ppm total lead….To reduce your risk of lead poisoning, the following is advised: Good Gardening Practices to Reduce Lead Exposure
-Locate gardens away from old painted structures and heavily travelled roads.
-Give planting preferences to fruiting crops (tomatoes, squash, peas, sunflowers, corn, etc.).
-Incorporate organic materials such as high quality compost, humus, and peat moss.
-Lime soil as recommended by soil test (a soil pH of 6.5 to 7.0 will minimize lead “