Tell your workplace you're about to switch from carrying a phone to a landline: what is their fallback option? (It's about 50/50 whether they have one, but they definitely should.)
Tell your workplace you're about to switch from carrying a phone to a landline: what is their fallback option? (It's about 50/50 whether they have one, but they definitely should.)
> Tell your workplace you're about to switch from carrying a phone to a landline
In my country we still respect people who use dumbphones, because a religious minority eschews the smartphone. I'm very grateful for this, I tell my bank and other entities that I have to deal with that I have a dumbphone and all local entities have a path for accommodating this.To make matters worse, TOTP is easy to copy for 'backup' purposes, so it's really not all that good (but still orders of magnitude more secure than SMS), but people are now actively encouraged to use multi-device TOTP like authy which practically invalidates it as a separate factor.
There are of course practical implications as well. Giving everyone a Yubikey is problematic due to cost, same with smartcards and readers at every workstation (the card isn't the problem, replacing everything with readers and changing the authentication system to accept smartcards is). RSA SecureID is expensive too, and essentially just TOTP. You could only use FIDO-enabled devices like the ones with secure enclaves, but that has the same problem as smartcards.
One thing that happens a lot around here is people carrying two phones, which doesn't solve anything but does shift the work/blame/cost on the company because everything will have to be done on 'their' device. This is a bit impractical because now you're constantly walking around with two phones, or have to manage which phone you happen to have on you.
On top of everything else: all other second factors can be lost too, that is by design because it is supposed to be 'something you have'.
The problem is how the phone is irreplaceable and non-redundant, and not that it can be lost.
The problem that causes the symptom is pass-the-audit mentality in the implementation of MFA. You have many options to make this "better" like picking any push, FIDO, U2F and TOTP method at authentication time. Lose 3 of those and you still have one available for the normal flow. And then there are backup codes that most people don't actually print and store because for some reason they are either unaware of it or believe that it will never affect them.
I've had pushback from the employer about this a few times, but in the end, there's nothing they can do.
This means using one of your older devices for it if available, otherwise you can purchase the cheapest unlocked one sold at an outlet store and consider it a cost of doing business like clothing.
In the previous job, you were sent the form for 24x7 building access and were free to drive into work within the on-call response period. You were also reimbursed for your cell phone, that was the bronze handcuff.
I only use a work phone for work business. If my work requires me to use a phone, I require a work phone.
Carrying two phones is a small price to pay to avoid worrying about an overzealous employer's IT staff.
Even if the business doesn’t want to audit your phones, a litigation event could force the issue.
Or at least 2008 when a set of vulnerabilities were published.
NIST describes a framework for required authenticators for different levels of trust. It’s a good starting place for understanding what represents secure practices vs theater.