Karl Marx would be happy to hear that. If you implement your idea then small fraction of society would use their free time to learn, read books, follow their passion or improve the world. Much larger fraction would concentrate on pleasant but much less challenging aspects of life like partying/booze/drugs/sex/good food/watching tv/browsing net. [Edit:spelling]
Im not proposing giving everybody tonnes of money. Im talking about a effective system to help the poor. I and most other people think that one of the things the stat has to do is to help poor people. Nowdays we do this in a really bad way and we make it really hard for them to get out off the system. Why would somebody that is unemployed talk a low paying job? He would because its not worth it if you get only a little be more money then when you stay unemployed and if they loose the job it talkes more then a month to get money again. Its economicly speaking extremly stupid way to do welfair.
Friedmans negativ income tax was much better because you allways have more then you would if you didn't work but that system has some other problems.
If you can come up with a better system tell it to me. If you think that the state should not be doing that at all say so. Dont tell im a marxist when I acctually stated that the idea is partly dirived from hayek. Hayek wrote one of the most inflential books against socialist ideas (the road to serfdom).