Well this analogy leaves out Twitter censorship, which makes Twitter unlikeable.
In many ways they are like Amnesty International in that no matter which human rights issue they report on, there will be a contingent that says, well everything else you says is true, but the stuff you said about me is completely wrong and you've loss all credibility.
It is a hard spot to be in trying to be neutral in a world of actors who only want the other side criticized or censored and never themselves.
I am glade I do not have such a role. I wouldn't be able to take the constant flak from all directions for actions or inaction.
Do you have a link of an example of what you say ? Were the people in those linked example not banned at the time? On average, how many people calling your precious "trans people" pedophiles and groomers are banned vs. how many of the trans people themselves get banned when they say things equivalent or far worse ?
It's mindblowing to me how the most coddled and put-on-a-pedestal group in public discourse is complaining about censorship and unfair treatment. They literally ban people for not using pronouns. It's honestly laughable.
I'm not going to acknowledge the second paragraph because it's just hilariously out of touch with reality.