Good luck making this work despite having next to no value contrast.
Good luck making this work despite having next to no value contrast.
I am doing everything else extra to make up for the lack of contrast in luminance if you read the documentation, but of course that can only do so much.
The reason to choose uniform luminance is also explained, and motivated by classical typography where you aim for a uniform, even appearance of text. I was attempting to achieve this while using the remaining colour space to still allow for the ability to scan for hue/chroma.
There was never any room to make it look “good” or “pretty” and as much as I personally also value beauty in design, I put function first here, even if that makes things look “muddy”.
Like I said: good luck making this work, because you sure are breaking a pretty important rule of choosing colors.
I’m glad I achieved my main goal though.
The artist isn't being arrogant. You ignored what they said and talked down to them, and they stood their ground. Now you're acting like they're doing something wrong, and publicly criticizing them.
No, it's not arrogance. It's just that you are arguing without understanding.
I am curious how you think I could have said "dude you are making this so fucking hard on yourself by choosing to have next to no value contrast, here are some ways I regularly have to check that I'm not doing this by mistake, good luck figuring out how to get everything else so amazingly perfect that it overcomes this giant deliberate flaw" without sounding "arrogant".