Realistically most outlets feigns independence but demonstrate fealty to particular power centers.
It's obvious how little point there is when you try to "measure" RT on the left wing/right wing scale (theyre pro russia above all) but what applies to them applies equally to all other outlets.
It's particularly galling when the power center is authoritarian/corporatist but wears a progressive mask for sake of fooling the naive.
Would they need more categories, then? Like geo-political orientation and state influence (although the latter would often be close to the press freedom rating)?
This is still too vague even, I think and there are probably complex sub-centres of power (e.g. factions within the democrats) and alliances (e.g. the neocon/democratic party nexus) reflected as well.
All of this gets airbrushed over by the traditional left/right continuum.
It's critically important too, coz it definitely drives both what is reported and how it's selectively presented and is a better predictor than an arbitary left/right designation.