There's plenty of good reasons for one to want to do so.
There's plenty of good reasons for one to want to do so.
If you're actually doing those things inside one, you're literally doing it wrong
Yes you might have some special cases where some of this is needed but I'd use anything besides systemd
See for more details: https://github.com/krallin/tini/issues/8#issuecomment-146135...
I still think that orchestration should live outside containers, whether within one box or several. BTW systemd has some vestiges of container orchestration built in.
OTOH there are other approaches; say, LXD directly assumes an ecosystem of processes within a container, more akin to a VM than to a single chroot-ed / jailed service process.
Those are what I had in mind. Basically cheaper VPS like service but built on Linux container tech instead of full virtualization. Maybe they are less of a rage these days, when fully virtualized KVM/Vmware VPS are so cheap. But about 5 years ago I did run my email server, webserver and database on such a container for $1-1.5$/mo. When I was able to switch to full virtualization at similar price point, I did. But there's nothing weird about runing multiple different processes in a "container" :)
b) systemd is the only thing that can start services cleanly and correctly. Every other solution is in various states of brokenness.