Understand that cookie banners are malicious compliance and they make a lot more sense.
If the vague proposal I’m suggesting sounds outlandish, that’s more or less how every major browser implements other requests for intrusive APIs as a matter of protecting users. Even when they do it half-heartedly they do it by developing a standard with their more invested peers which is far less prone to universal abuse.
> Understand that cookie banners are malicious compliance and they make a lot more sense.
How are they malicious compliance? The laws are poorly-reasoned and poorly-written. I'll continue to be mad about that.
*Edit: Sorry if this came off as rude but it was a legitimate question. I honestly cannot think of another plausible reason that would explain the proliferation of the banners.