However cryptocurrency != "an experimental bridge protocol that raised its seed round 3 months ago"
The main point still stands. The crypto world sees "the code is the law" and non-repudiable/non-reversible transactions as a feature. The rest of the world (correctly in my view) sees it as a bug.
That "main point" was never justified here. Commenters just assumed that a hack on an experimental bridge protocol reflected on crypto as a whole