As seen in some of the comments below. As if they personally made it possible. It's like your country winning a sports tournament and claiming that "WE" won. No, you didn't. You just watched it.
As seen in some of the comments below. As if they personally made it possible. It's like your country winning a sports tournament and claiming that "WE" won. No, you didn't. You just watched it.
Besides, The two main contenders for the title from Cambodia and Indonesia have stone inscriptions with 'Zero' for the 'Saka' calendar year; So even if the inscriptions are older, The origin of zero likely points to somewhere in Indian subcontinent of Saka Era.
The author seems to conflate between 'Origin of zero' and 'Latest evidence for oldest occurrence of zero'.
I don't think professors dealing with Epigraphy, Philology (or) Archeology can make such a mistake unless writing a click-bait article with misleading content was the goal.