Clinical features and novel presentations of human monkeypox

bmj.com

9 pointswoliveirajr7 comments

This seems pretty relevant:

- 35.9% participants had concomitant HIV infection

- 31.5% of those screened for sexually transmitted infections had a concomitant sexually transmitted infection

Maybe a NSFW tag?

Why would anyone get in trouble at work for reading a 100% text article in a famous medical journal?

EDIT: I did not see the images due to adblocker settings. Please disregard.

Did you read the article? There are images of male genitalia with lesions.

I did not, sorry. I have some aggressive uBlock Origin filters that prefer false positives over false negatives on mobile.

I agree, NSFW warning is appropriate!

@dang, can't edit it, could you add a NSFW flag?

Emailed dang asking to edit the title.