The topics in question are often relevant to working in tech. I know because I've been the training person for various tech organizations. I did my best to bring in information and topics that are fresh and new.
So I get the feeling that a lot of workplace training is not being done out there. A lot of tech people are doing their work by using their tech skills, going home to rest, repeat. And that's all they have time to do, maybe. But that's a workplace problem, too. It's a problem for leadership and for the future of any corporation.
Traditional logic, creativity, and tech skills are only valuable to a point. Beyond that point they will get individuals stuck in subjective loops and estrange them from new capabilities in problem solving. When I mention this, people tend to think, "ah, this person is talking about (people|team|emotional|life) skills!" But in fact this applies to many tech problems and involves techniques that can be studied and applied personally.
Anyway. Just the first type of interaction that comes to mind.
I got SIRVA and lost effective use of my right arm. It's only slowly gotten better through rehab.
I basically tell no one about it anymore. I learned from both sides of the ONLY acceptable conversational dichotomy (vaccine for, or vaccine against?) that they will either use my condition as a) support for their opinion that everybody who is crazy thinks vaccines are a conspiracy, just go get the shot or b) support for their opinion that vaccines are bad for you.
(Is SIRVA pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine? Is that even an important question?)
I sent people BMJ links, I got a Youtube comment section to rally in my support after a prominent Youtuber tried to "cool story bro" me. But none of that really helped; it was just a frustrating situation. Meanwhile I couldn't move my hand from keyboard over to the mouse without excruciating pain, for months...
People can't tolerate little details and nuances, seriously. Nothing personal but that's a massive weak side for us humans.