The 60MW seems a bit more antithetical to home design than the height! That's a not-small amount of power.
No but it sounds about right to supply a large parking garage (or three!) of charging EVs.
Average American drives 14,263 miles per year.
Tesla Model 3 consumes 0.27 kWh/mi.
Average American driving a Tesla uses 3851.01 kWh / year.
60MW reactor produces 525,600,000 kWh / year.
So a single NuScale reactor could power a garage with 136,483 electric cars.
Sure, but there are a couple of things to consider like peak consumption (everyone gets home from work and plugs in) or potentially much better utilization of electric vehicles from av adoption which might happen in the timeframes needed to get this tech out.
Nuclear is pretty terrible for peak consumption though! It's perfect for base load.
Those dogecoins aren't going to mine themselves.
Or people will just have a nuclear tower on their lawn. If it can be buried (or partially buried), the tower need not be taller than the house. With some decorations similar to the ones on cell phone towers, it could even look reasonably attractive.
Back of the envelope, 60MW is 30,000 homes. So a small city or very large town could install just a couple of these and be completely set.
Perhaps for individual detached houses; 20m can easily fit inside apartment buildings...
The Nuscale design requires that the reactors are submerged in a below ground pool.