If you pass a moving probe through a magnetic field your meaured results vary by direction (with or perpendicular to flux) and velocity.
If you want to measure a geomagnetic field using an aircraft, the heading matters.
To normalise in post processing you calibrate a Kalman filter by flying precessing butterfly wing patterns in a known relatively level flux area and then use that to remove the magnetic signature of the aircraft and heading from data collected over multiple headings and days.
( There are a few other twists - diurnal flux and induced field from the Earths GMF interactions needs to be isolated, etc ).
In the frequency domain, that's equivalent to multiplying one Gaussian by another one with zero mean, which will always put higher weight on low frequencies. No matter what the gain is in the Kalman filter, that'll still be true as far as I can tell. As the gain varies, the cutoff within the low-pass filter will change though.
It gets harder to analyze when you start using non-linear models to update position though. Generally, I think the same logic applies.