I've found that the more I spend time on writing, the ideas that are being written about change in a way that generally coalesces into something better defined and of higher quality than just quickly writing down the initial form of the idea.

Forcing one's self to write, forces more in-depth thinking about the topic, which can lead to surprising and unexpected revelations (which I would refer to as quality writing).

One doesn't need to keep the journey, just publish the destination. The reader doesn't need the journey the writer took, but the writer sure does.

Stack the deck in your favor.

After 10 years of doing a thing every day you'll be better than someone who didn't. And what's more they're likely never going to catch up, unless you completely stop and they start using your method.

And even then it'll take years.

And you should think of this other person as the alternative you.

Nah, that's optimizing practice. Eventually you roll into whatever because it's old hat. Would you tell BB King playing every day he was optimizing for nothing?

Haha. You can and will hit a bad streak, it's inevitable. There is value in doing the thing.

Pretty soon all that practice adds up. YMMV. But like the article said it's gotta be action.

What is doesn't say is this is a way to build small wins. It only takes a small chain to create momentum.

The point of the strategy is that "bad" writing is better than the alternative of no writing at all. That's why the linked article specifically says that Seinfeld said nothing about the goal, only consistency.