Their open source code editor is actually closed source, I'd tell you to check yourself, but you legally are not allowed to reverse engineer it either.
And it pushed the open opensource alternative, Atom, out of the running.
dotNET? Obviously in response to the progress of mono, which now supports .NET 4.7 (current .NET is 6), C# 7 (current is C# 10)
I don't know if lagging 2-3 versions behind is normal for mono, however, if they are currently "Sponsored by Microsoft", shouldn't the situation get better?
- - -
the article lists the copilot issue, and the .net bull, that's 2 of the 3 open-source things microsoft directly does. paying lip service to a kernel, does not make a company an open source company.
- - -
Azure runs linux on their boxes because the Windows-only Azure in every other universe, closed its doors due to nearly no customers